Business Law

write for 2 pages :

 

Here what I want you use in my papeer, I want you write this in my perer step by step :

 

1- Issue

2.Rule

3- Analysis

4-Conclusion

5- What you learned

6-Content and Quality Connections

 

Here the explain about that i need in that paper .

 

This will be the rubric used to evaluate your case submissions with the one exception that is noted in the Module 5.

 

 

 

IRAC Grading Rubric

 

 

 

IRAC/Case Analysis Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

 

Issue

view longer description

Clearly identifies the relevant issue of the case

5 pts

Identifies the issue but is not a clear and concise statement

4 pts

Can see an issue but does not properly address it

3 pts

Having difficulty concentrating on the issue.

2 pts

Does not understand the issue

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Rule

view longer description

Concisely states the rule

5 pts

Mostly states the rule

4 pts

Partially states the rule

3 pts

Vaguely states the rule

2 pts

Does not state the correct rule

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Analysis

view longer description

Clearly shows an understanding how the law applies to the facts.

5 pts

States how the facts and the law relate

4 pts

Does not clearly state how the facts and law relate

3 pts

Does not connect the facts or the law

2 pts

Unable to apply the law to the facts

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Conclusion

view longer description

Clearly and Concisely states the conclusion

5 pts

States a good conclusion

4 pts

States a conclusion that is not concise but still on point

3 pts

States a conclusion

2 pts

Does not state a conclusion

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

What you learned

view longer description

Clearly states what the case taught you

5 pts

States what the case is about (paraphrases case)

4 pts

States the case verbatim or interjected personal feelings into the response

3 pts

States ideas not connected to the case

2 pts

 

Did not understand the case.

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Content and Quality Connections

view longer description

Response is thoughtful, contains substantive insight and analysis in relation to topic. makes strong connections to readings, lecture, experience, workplace

5 pts

Response(s) demonstrate significant understanding. Robust insight and analysis. Evidence of connections.

4 pts

Content response is accurate but superficial. Some responses may be off topic. Acknowledges connections exist.

3 pts

Lacks depth; responses too general, conclusory, simplistic in nature. Some aspects of response are off topic. Posts lack connections.

2 pts

Interjected emotional responses, personal feelings, and /or beliefs in analysis

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Total Points: 30

 

 

 

______________________________________________________

 

Here the homework : 

 

M5 Discussion (Original Post)

Dec 31, 2013 at 11:15am
3
3

The case for this discussion is Stoll v. Runyon. (link at the bottom of the page)

After reading the case, assume you are a coworker of Cynthia Stoll, You  have just witnessed some of the coworkers behavior towards her.  What do should you do? 

Assume you are her supervisor and just became informed of this behavior, what would you do?

Assume  you  are the Human Resources Director, what would you do?

Assume you are the in house counsel what advice would you give?

You must be objective and NOT  insert your personal beliefs in the answer.  Use the IRAC analytical format to  respond to each separate issue you find (there are more issues than listed)” 

 You may do additional internet research,  the search terms “Sexual Harassment” and/or “Washington State” will be helpful

Response Posts: Respond to the posts of at least 2 other students.

 Note: The student response for this case is due three weeks from today.  

 

It is preferred if you prepare your response in Word and upload the file.  Use spell and grammar check and have Word  check the document for readability before uploading.  Please include the readability score  with your submission.

 View in a new window

Stoll v. Runyon.pdfPreview the documentView in a new window

Solution:

15% off for this assignment.

Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!

Why US?

100% Confidentiality

Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.

Timely Delivery

No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.

Original Writing

We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.

Money Back

If you are convinced that our writer has not followed your requirements, feel free to ask for a refund.

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?