Journal Respond to the two questions below. These are discrete questions, so you can answer them in two distinct paragraphs instead of integrating the information within one response. If you could write about anything, what would you write about? If your writing teacher simply said, “Write what you want,” where would you start? If you weren’t taught the five paragraph form, what kind of form(s) have you been taught? How have you been taught to structure essays? What reasons have you been given for structuring your essays in these ways?  Requirements Journals should be more than 250 words and answer the prompt completely The rubric includes a section for sources; please not that sources are not necessary for this response. All students will receive maximum points for this category.  Due Sunday at 11:59 PM EST Rubric NEC Writing Rubric NEC Writing Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext and Purpose 20.0 to >18.0 pts Exemplary Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task (e.g. expectation of faculty). 18.0 to >16.0 pts Proficient Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose, and a clear focus on the assigned task 16.0 to >14.0 pts Satisfactory Demonstrates awareness of context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned task. 14.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the task. 0.0 pts Not Evident No evidence of this critical element. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Development 20.0 to >18.0 pts Exemplary Uses appropriate, relevant and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the student’s understanding and shaping the whole work. Meets length requirement. 18.0 to >16.0 pts Proficient Uses appropriate, relevant and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work. Somewhat meets length requirement. 16.0 to >14.0 pts Satisfactory Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas through most of the work. Does not adequately meet length requirement. 14.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work. Does not meet length requirement. 0.0 pts Not Evident No evidence of this critical element. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections to Experience (Connects relevant experience and academic knowledge) 20.0 to >18.0 pts Exemplary Meaningfully synthesizes connections among experiences outside of the formal classroom (including life experiences and academic experiences) to deepen understanding of fields of study and to broaden own points of view. 18.0 to >16.0 pts Proficient Effectively selects and develops examples of life experiences, drawn from a variety of contexts (e.g. family life, artistic participation, civic involvement, work experience) to illuminate concepts/theories/ frameworks of fields of study. 16.0 to >14.0 pts Satisfactory Compares life experiences and academic knowledge to infer differences, as well as similarities, and acknowledge perspectives other than own. 14.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Identifies connections between life experiences and those academic texts and ideas perceived as similar and related to own interests. 0.0 pts Not Evident No evidence of this critical element. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources/ Evidence 15.0 to >13.0 pts Exemplary Demonstrates skillful use of high quality, credible relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of writing. Uses proper APA/MLA citations with little to no errors. 13.0 to >12.0 pts Proficient Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of writing. Uses APA/MLA citations with little to a few errors. 12.0 to >10.0 pts Satisfactory Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre. Uses APA/MLA citations that have several style errors. 10.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the discussion and does not use any citations. 0.0 pts Not Evident Demonstrates no attempt to use or cite sources. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePromptness/ Initiative 15.0 to >13.0 pts Exemplary Submits on time. 13.0 to >12.0 pts Proficient Submits late with prior faculty approval. 12.0 to >10.0 pts Satisfactory Submits late with post faculty approval. 10.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Submits late. 0.0 pts Not Evident Submits late. No credit per discretion of faculty. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics/ Syntax 10.0 to >9.0 pts Exemplary Uses language that is easily understood, clear, with proper grammar and spelling. 9.0 to >8.0 pts Proficient Uses language that is easily understood, with acceptable grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >7.0 pts Satisfactory Uses language that is understandable, but contains some errors in grammar, clarity, and spelling. 7.0 to >0.0 pts Needs Improvement Uses language that is not entirely understandable, and contains errors in grammar, clarity, and spelling. 0.0 pts Not Evident Uses language that is not understandable 10.0 pts Total Points: 100.0 PreviousNext

 
CLICK 'ORDER NOW' BUTTON BELOW TO GET HELP WITH ANY ASSIGNMENT/ESSAY/DISCUSSION BOARD/HOMEWORK. 15% OFF FOR YOUR FIRST ORDER
× WhatsApp us here